Holston Box & Lumber Co. v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Holston Box & Lumber Co. v. King

117 S.E. 467, 30 Ga. App. 234, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 364

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 18, 1923

Docket14010

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 467 (Holston Box & Lumber Co. v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holston Box & Lumber Co. v. King, 117 S.E. 467, 30 Ga. App. 234, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. The verdict rendered for the plaintiff on account of lumber furnished under a contract of purchase and sale is authorized by the evidence.

2. It appearing from the record that counsel for each of the litigants had admitted in open court that the sole issue in dispute was the amount of lumber delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, the court did not err in instructing the jury accordingly.

■Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

1. The verdict rendered for the plaintiff on account of lumber furnished under a contract of purchase and sale is authorized by the evidence.

2. It appearing from the record that counsel for each of the litigants had admitted in open court that the sole issue in dispute was the amount of lumber delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, the court did not err in instructing the jury accordingly.

■Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 467, 30 Ga. App. 234, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holston-box-lumber-co-v-king-gactapp-1923.