Holstein v. Pacific Finance Corp.
This text of 256 A.D. 982 (Holstein v. Pacific Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for an order directing severance of alleged causes of action, including service by each plaintiff of a separate complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appellants’ time to answer extended until ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 982, 11 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holstein-v-pacific-finance-corp-nyappdiv-1939.