Holshouser v. Morgan
This text of 138 S.E.2d 822 (Holshouser v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, alleged facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient to require that the' court submit the issues for jury determination. Hence, defendant’s demurrer to complaint “for failure ... to allege a eause of action,” -and defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit, were properly overruled.
[99]*99Defendant’s remaining assignments of error, éxcept formal assignments, relate to (1) rulings on evidence, (2) portions of the charge, as given and (3) the court’s failure to' give additional instructions. Each of these assignments has received full consideration. In our view, none discloses prejudicial error or merits discussion in detail.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 S.E.2d 822, 263 N.C. 98, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holshouser-v-morgan-nc-1964.