Holsey v. State

86 S.E. 417, 17 Ga. App. 270
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 7, 1915
Docket6628
StatusPublished

This text of 86 S.E. 417 (Holsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holsey v. State, 86 S.E. 417, 17 Ga. App. 270 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The verdict is supported by sufficient evidence; and since there is no complaint that any error of law was committed in the trial, it was not error to refuse a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Sandersville— Judge Jordan. May 22, 1915. Evans & Evans, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Hyman, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 417, 17 Ga. App. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holsey-v-state-gactapp-1915.