Holsey v. Kastendieck

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7419

AARON HOLSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD KASTENDIECK, Individually and as Assistant Attorney General for the State of Maryland; SANDRA BOOSE, Individually and as Case Management Supervisor at the central laundry facility; MARK WILSON, Individually and as a Case Management Specialist II assigned at the central laundry facility, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2360-K)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Holsey v. Kastendieck, No. CA-95-2360-K (D. Md. Aug. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED