Holscher v. United States

District Court, D. Montana·Decided July 13, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-00067·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

TERRIE HOLSCHER, CV-20-67-GF-BMM Plaintiff, ORDER V. MATTHEW J. DEURMEIER, FBI AGENT, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Terrie Holscher (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against Robert Harris, Kenneth Hess, Sean Maguire, FBI Special Agents Matthew Deurmeier and Jonathan Tjernagel, Director of the FBI Christopher Wray, and then, U.S. Attorney General William Barr (collectively, ‘““Defendants”) based on claims arising from a storage unit inspection by the FBI and authorizing search warrant. (Doc. 1; Doc. 53 at 7). Plaintiff has filed a Rule 60(b) motion to amend the Court’s judgment granting motions to dismiss in favor of Defendants (Doc. 87). (Doc. 94.) The Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Plaintiff’s motion because the motion was filed after the notice of appeal was filed. Katzir’s Floor and Home Design, Inc. v. M-MLS.com,

394 F.3d 1143, 1148 (9th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment (Doc. 94) is DENIED. DATED this 13th day of July, 2022.

wa ‘ Adin) btu

United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holscher v. United States, (D. Mont. 2022).

Holscher v. United States (Holscher v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.