Holsapple v. . International Paper Company
111 N.E. 1084, 216 N.Y. 746, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1534
This text of 111 N.E. 1084 (Holsapple v. . International Paper Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holsapple v. . International Paper Company, 111 N.E. 1084, 216 N.Y. 746, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1534 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting on the ground that it was error as matter of law to hold that- the plank from which the plaintiff fell was a scaffold: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Storrier v. . Mosier Summers
116 N.E. 981 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 1084, 216 N.Y. 746, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holsapple-v-international-paper-company-ny-1916.