Holsapple v. . International Paper Company

111 N.E. 1084, 216 N.Y. 746, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1534
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 4, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting on the ground that it was error as matter of law to hold that- the plank from which the plaintiff fell was a scaffold: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holsapple v. . International Paper Company, 111 N.E. 1084, 216 N.Y. 746, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1534 (N.Y. 1916).

111 N.E. 1084 (Holsapple v. . International Paper Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Storrier v. . Mosier Summers
116 N.E. 981 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)