Holroyd v. Eibling

Ohio Supreme Court

Holroyd v. Eibling

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 27

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 17, 1962

DocketNo. 37708

StatusPublished

This text of 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 27 (Holroyd v. Eibling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holroyd v. Eibling, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 27 (Ohio 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

[28]*28The appeal as of right herein is dismissed sua sponte for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Long, Doyle and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Long, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J. Doyle, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[28]*28The appeal as of right herein is dismissed sua sponte for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Long, Doyle and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Long, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J. Doyle, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holroyd-v-eibling-ohio-1962.