Holocek v. Rich Nowak Construction Co.

259 A.D.2d 467, 685 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2064
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holocek v. Rich Nowak Construction Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D.2d 466

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Rich Nowak Construction Co., Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 6, 1998, as denied that branch of its motion which was for reargument of its motion for summary judgment on its cross claim against the defendant Woodcastle Construction Co.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holocek v. Rich Nowak Construction Co., 259 A.D.2d 467, 685 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 467 (Holocek v. Rich Nowak Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.