Holmquist v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Holmquist v. Miller

360 N.W.2d 1, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1580

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmquist v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1061 →

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 20, 1984·No. Nos. C7-83-1919, C7-84-84 and CX-84-371·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Gerald, Harold and Agnes Miller and the petition of James Gabbert for further review of the decisions of the Court of Appeals be, and the same are, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-entitled matters are consolidated for consideration before this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Gerald, Harold and Agnes Miller and the petition of James Gabbert for further review of the decisions of the Court of Appeals be, and the same are, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-entitled matters are consolidated for consideration before this court.

Holmquist v. Miller, 360 N.W.2d 1, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1580 (Mich. 1984).

Pincite

360 N.W.2d 1 (Holmquist v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.