Holmon v. Aramark
This text of Holmon v. Aramark (Holmon v. Aramark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) ANTHONY ULYSSES HOLMON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0938 (RBW) ) ARAMARK, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 10, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The Court advised the
plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this
Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned the plaintiff that, if he did not respond to
the motion by July 23, 2014, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. The plaintiff’s
deadline since has been extended to August 15, 2014. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an
opposition to the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will
grant the defendants’ motion as conceded.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/ REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge
DATE: September 2, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holmon v. Aramark, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmon-v-aramark-dcd-2014.