Holmes Vs. Holmes
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILBERT ROY HOLMES, No. 80923 Appellant, vs. FILED CAPUCINE YOLANDA HOLMES, Z020 APR Respondent. 3ROLA: CLE COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL sy DEi•UTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying rehearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Rena G. Hughes, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order appealed from is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying rehearing. Alvis v. State, Gaming Control Bd., 99 Nev. 184, 660 P.2d 980 (1983), disapproved of on other grounds by AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) L947A 24-14,513, cc: Hon. Rena G. Hughes, District Judge, Family Court Division Wilbert Roy Holmes Heaton Fontano, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME Count OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A •Mgrj. 2 ii4aln951V12 or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes Vs. Holmes (Holmes Vs. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.