Holmes Vs. 24-7Motorcoach.Com
This text of 490 P.3d 1291 (Holmes Vs. 24-7Motorcoach.Com) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILBERT ROY HOLMES, No. 83171 Appellant, vs. 24- 7MOTORCOACH. COM, FILED Respondent. JUL 2 9 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK_OF SUPREME COURT BY 5 .\it DEPUrYC1.ERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order that denied appellant's appeal from a justice court judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tara D. Clark Newberry, Judge. The district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh u. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Hardesty •
4"146"1.177. Parraguirre Caclish
cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge Wilbert Roy Holmes 24-7Motorcoach.com Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
0:” I947A 611-‘2 ci So _ • • '4„, • . , Itesdir
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 P.3d 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-vs-24-7motorcoachcom-nev-2021.