Holmes v. Yalovitz
148 S.E. 753, 40 Ga. App. 72, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 19
Opinion
The present case is governed by the general rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by this court unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict as returned was absolutely demanded by the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303) ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. Yalovitz, 148 S.E. 753, 40 Ga. App. 72, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 19 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
148 S.E. 753 (Holmes v. Yalovitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Ross
153 S.E. 575 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)