Holmes v. Yalovitz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Holmes v. Yalovitz

148 S.E. 753, 40 Ga. App. 72, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 19

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 17, 1929

Docket19516

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 753 (Holmes v. Yalovitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. Yalovitz, 148 S.E. 753, 40 Ga. App. 72, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 19 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

The present case is governed by the general rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by this court unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict as returned was absolutely demanded by the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303) ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., coneu/r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

The present case is governed by the general rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by this court unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict as returned was absolutely demanded by the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303) ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., coneu/r.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 753, 40 Ga. App. 72, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-yalovitz-gactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack