Holmes v. Wm. Hengerer Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holmes v. Wm. Hengerer Co.

277 A.D.2d 936

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 936 (Holmes v. Wm. Hengerer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. Wm. Hengerer Co., 277 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendant. (See Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Ine., 262 H. V. 107.) All concur, Vaughan, J., not voting. (The judgment appealed from is for plaintiff in a negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendant. (See Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Ine., 262 H. V. 107.) All concur, Vaughan, J., not voting. (The judgment appealed from is for plaintiff in a negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-wm-hengerer-co-nyappdiv-1950.