Holmes v. Welch
This text of 12 Ind. 555 (Holmes v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by the appellants against the appellee, on an account for goods sold and delivered, viz., brandies and whiskies.
The defendant answered, admitting that on the 15th of February, 1856, he purchased from the plaintiffs the bill of liquors, in the state of Indiana; that the same were intoxicating liquors, and were not sold to him for medical, chemical, mechanical, or sacramental purposes. A counter-claim was also set up for money paid by the defendant to the plaintiffs for liquors thus sold by plaintiffs to the defendant.
The plaintiffs demurred to this defense; but the demurrer was overruled, and the plaintiffs excepted. Judgment for the defendant.
The demurrer should have been sustained. It has been determined that, at the time of the sale in question, there was no law in force in the state, prohibiting or regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors. Meshmeier v. The State, 11 Ind. R. 482.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ind. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-welch-ind-1859.