Holmes v. Wainwright

389 So. 2d 1233, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17608
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1980
DocketNo. 77-547/T4-5
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 389 So. 2d 1233 (Holmes v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Wainwright, 389 So. 2d 1233, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17608 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

Appellant had a fair trial that reached a just result but it was not a perfect trial. Technical error was committed in admitting hearsay into evidence. Nevertheless, in our opinion, after an examination of the entire case, it does not appear that a different result would have been reached at trial if the error had not occurred nor that the error resulted in a miscarriage of justice. We are constrained by Section 59.041, Flori[1234]*1234da Statutes (1979), from reversing the judgment below and it is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hernandez v. State
547 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Robins v. State
468 So. 2d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 So. 2d 1233, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-wainwright-fladistctapp-1980.