Holmes v. Wainwright

389 So. 2d 1233, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17608
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1980·No. No. 77-547/T4-5·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

Appellant had a fair trial that reached a just result but it was not a perfect trial. Technical error was committed in admitting hearsay into evidence. Nevertheless, in our opinion, after an examination of the entire case, it does not appear that a different result would have been reached at trial if the error had not occurred nor that the error resulted in a miscarriage of justice. We are constrained by Section 59.041, Flori[1234]*1234da Statutes (1979), from reversing the judgment below and it is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. Wainwright, 389 So. 2d 1233, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17608 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

389 So. 2d 1233 (Holmes v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. State
547 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Robins v. State
468 So. 2d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)