Holmes v. . the City of New York

109 N.E. 1078, 215 N.Y. 643, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1065
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1915·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, w.ith costs; no opinion.'

Concur: Hisoock; Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. . the City of New York, 109 N.E. 1078, 215 N.Y. 643, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1065 (N.Y. 1915).

109 N.E. 1078 (Holmes v. . the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.