Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Holmes v. Taylor

Holmes v. Taylor

456 So. 2d 1323, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2179, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2162
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 So. 2d 1323 (Holmes v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Taylor, 456 So. 2d 1323, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2179, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the propriety of an adverse summary judgment. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the appellee/movant failed to negate the existence of genuine issues of material fact. Consequently the final summary judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. See Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368 (Fla.1979); McCabe v. Walt Disney World Co., 350 So.2d 814 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

[1324]*1324Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caminiti v. Barrymore Watercraft Chartering Corp.
471 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 1323, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2179, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-taylor-fladistctapp-1984.