Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Holmes v. Suffrin

Holmes v. Suffrin

198 Ill. App. 45, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 336
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 14, 1916
DocketGen. No. 21,844
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 198 Ill. App. 45 (Holmes v. Suffrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Suffrin, 198 Ill. App. 45, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 336 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Frauds, Statute of, § 2*—when debtor not released by oral promise. A valid oral promise may be made with regard to the debt of a third person without releasing the original debtor. 4. Frauds, Statute of, § 126*—when evidence sufficient to show promise to be original. In an action by a subcontractor against the owner of the property to recover on a promise to pay for the work done under the contract, evidence examined and held sufficient to warrant a finding that the promise was direct and original and not within the Statute of Frauds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fluor Corporation v. United States
405 F.2d 823 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Fluor Corp. v. United States ex rel. Mosher Steel Co.
405 F.2d 823 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 Ill. App. 45, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-suffrin-illappct-1916.