Holmes v. Suffrin

198 Ill. App. 45, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 336
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided February 14, 1916·No. Gen. No. 21,844·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Frauds, Statute of, § 2*—when debtor not released by oral promise. A valid oral promise may be made with regard to the debt of a third person without releasing the original debtor. 4. Frauds, Statute of, § 126*—when evidence sufficient to show promise to be original. In an action by a subcontractor against the owner of the property to recover on a promise to pay for the work done under the contract, evidence examined and held sufficient to warrant a finding that the promise was direct and original and not within the Statute of Frauds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. Suffrin, 198 Ill. App. 45, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 336 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

198 Ill. App. 45 (Holmes v. Suffrin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fluor Corporation v. United States
405 F.2d 823 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)