Holmes v. State

285 S.E.2d 575, 159 Ga. App. 765, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2798

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Ga. App. 817 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 30, 1981·No. 62456·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for rape and aggravated assault. Held:

1. The evidence was sufficient, when viewed in a light favorable to the verdict, to convince a rational trier of fact as to the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion in limine which sought to exclude testimony of a photographic identification.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for rape and aggravated assault. Held:

1. The evidence was sufficient, when viewed in a light favorable to the verdict, to convince a rational trier of fact as to the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion in limine which sought to exclude testimony of a photographic identification.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Holmes v. State, 285 S.E.2d 575, 159 Ga. App. 765, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2798 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

285 S.E.2d 575 (Holmes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.