Holmes v. State

233 S.E.2d 63, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1824
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1977
Docket53347
StatusPublished

This text of 233 S.E.2d 63 (Holmes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. State, 233 S.E.2d 63, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1824 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted of selling heroin. His-defense was that of alibi. Held:

1. Defendant attacks the charge on alibi as being burden shifting. The trial court charged’ on alibi in substantially the same language as a charge that was approved by the Supreme Court in Mills v. State, 236 Ga. 364 (223 SE2d 724).

2. The evidence authorized the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., [182]*182 concur. Submitted January 19, 1977 Decided February 2, 1977. Percy Blount, for appellant. Richard E. Allen, District Attorney, Gayle B. Hamrick, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mills v. State
223 S.E.2d 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 S.E.2d 63, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-state-gactapp-1977.