Holmes v. State
233 S.E.2d 63, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1824
This text of 233 S.E.2d 63 (Holmes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holmes v. State, 233 S.E.2d 63, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1824 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of selling heroin. His-defense was that of alibi. Held:
1. Defendant attacks the charge on alibi as being burden shifting. The trial court charged’ on alibi in substantially the same language as a charge that was approved by the Supreme Court in Mills v. State, 236 Ga. 364 (223 SE2d 724).
2. The evidence authorized the conviction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mills v. State
223 S.E.2d 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 S.E.2d 63, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-state-gactapp-1977.