Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Holmes v. State

Holmes v. State

13 S.E.2d 114, 65 Ga. App. 13, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 229
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 28, 1941·No. 28876.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The evidence to the effect that the defendant was found in possession of a number of original lottery tickets, together with the time, place, and manner of explanation of that possession, •coupled with other evidence regarding the existence and manner of operating the lottery known as the “number game,” was sufficient to sustain a conviction. The assignments of error regarding the ■admission of testimony, and the statement by the judge, in a collo•quy in passing on an objection to testimony, to the effect that the Court of Appeals has held “that is the proper way to prove the •operation of a lottery,” do not demand a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J„ and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. State, 13 S.E.2d 114, 65 Ga. App. 13, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 229 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).

13 S.E.2d 114 (Holmes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tek-Aid, Inc. v. Eisenberg
223 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Jones v. State
104 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
James v. State
102 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Green v. State
73 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Crowder v. State
73 S.E.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Goss v. State
61 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)