Holmes v. State
This text of 13 S.E.2d 114 (Holmes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence to the effect that the defendant was found in possession of a number of original lottery tickets, together with the time, place, and manner of explanation of that possession, •coupled with other evidence regarding the existence and manner of operating the lottery known as the “number game,” was sufficient to sustain a conviction. The assignments of error regarding the ■admission of testimony, and the statement by the judge, in a collo•quy in passing on an objection to testimony, to the effect that the Court of Appeals has held “that is the proper way to prove the •operation of a lottery,” do not demand a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 S.E.2d 114, 65 Ga. App. 13, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-state-gactapp-1941.