Holmes v. State

645 So. 2d 600, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11482, 1994 WL 665723
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1994·No. No. 94-0421·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends and appellee concedes that the trial court erred in revoking appellant’s probation and in committing appellant indefinitely to the probation and restitution center.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to determine if appellant has paid the balance of restitution owed, his discharge from probation being dependent upon his fulfilling that obligation.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. State, 645 So. 2d 600, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11482, 1994 WL 665723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

645 So. 2d 600 (Holmes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. State
669 So. 2d 1145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)