Holmes v. State
This text of Holmes v. State (Holmes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ERIC HOLMES, § § No. 267, 2014 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for New Castle County § STATE OF DELAWARE, § No. 1210019908 § Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §
Submitted: January 28, 2015 Decided: January 29, 2015
Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices.
ORDER On this 29th day of January 2015, after careful consideration of the parties’
briefs and the record below, we find that the Superior Court’s ruling denying the
Appellant’s motion for acquittal should be affirmed. The State offered sufficient
evidence so that a rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most
favorable to the State, could have found that the Appellant knowingly possessed a
firearm in violation of 11 Del. C. § 14481 beyond a reasonable doubt.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
1 11 Del. C. § 1448.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holmes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-state-del-2015.