Holmes v. Slater

119 A.D. 924, 105 N.Y.S. 1121

Opinions

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, without costs; with leave to defendants to withdraw demurrer and answer upon payment,, of costs of demurrer at Special Term:. No .opinion. All .¡concurred, except Sewell, J., dissenting. ‘ ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. Slater, 119 A.D. 924, 105 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

119 A.D. 924 (Holmes v. Slater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penniman v. Fuller & Warren Co.
31 N.E. 818 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Elizabethport Manufacturing Co. v. Campbell
13 Abb. Pr. 86 (New York Supreme Court, 1861)