Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Holmes v. Sheridan

Holmes v. Sheridan

56 A. 308, 65 N.J. Eq. 765, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 307
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedAugust 25, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 56 A. 308 (Holmes v. Sheridan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Sheridan, 56 A. 308, 65 N.J. Eq. 765, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 307 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens, filed in the court of chancery. See 56 Atl. Rep. 308.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voorhees, Vroom, Green — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A. 308, 65 N.J. Eq. 765, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-sheridan-nj-1903.