Holmes v. Seaman
91 N.Y.S. 1098, 99 A.D. 624
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. Seaman. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 A.D. 381 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1904·Published
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of McCord v. McCord, 40 App. Div. 273, 57 N. Y. Supp. 1049.
concurs solely upon the ground that the material facts in these cases are not distinguishable from those in the McCord Case; but, were it not for that precedent, he would vote for reversal upon* the ground that the assignment was valid as between the parties, and the assignee at least obtained an equitable lien, enforceable as against the assignors. PATTERSON, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. Seaman, 91 N.Y.S. 1098, 99 A.D. 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
91 N.Y.S. 1098 (Holmes v. Seaman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Assignment of Orlo Atwood & Sons
40 A.D. 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
McCord v. McCord
40 A.D. 275 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)