Holmes v. Remson
2 Cow. 410
Opinion
It is a matter of course to allow these and the like amendments, where the omission or informality is accounted for. We grant the rule as applied for, on paying the costs of this motion, and if the plaintiffs choose to dis[412] continue their proceedings in error, the defendants must also pay the costs of the writ of error.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. Remson, 2 Cow. 410 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).
2 Cow. 410 (Holmes v. Remson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frederick v. Circuit Judge
18 N.W. 343 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Fay v. Wenzell
62 Mass. 315 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1851)