Holmes v. Powers

439 S.W.2d 579, 1968 Ky. LEXIS 146
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedDecember 13, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 439 S.W.2d 579 (Holmes v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Powers, 439 S.W.2d 579, 1968 Ky. LEXIS 146 (Ky. 1968).

Opinion

PALMORE, Judge.

This, to say the least, is an unusual case. The appellants, county health officer and local medical society of Whitley County, seek a declaratory judgment to the effect that they can sterilize the appellee, a 35-year-old unmarried woman who is mentally retarded and has two illegitimate children (one of whom also is retarded), without civil or criminal liability to themselves. They appeal from an adjudication that they “cannot legally perform a sexual sterilization operation upon the defendant because the defendant is not mentally competent to grant permission and there is no legal authority providing for the granting of such permission in-any manner.”

There simply is no escape from the conclusion reached by the trial court. If, as alleged and proved, the appellee is in fact mentally incompetent, she does not have legal capacity to consent to anything. Nor, at her age, does the law give her parents any control of her person or property. It may be (though we do not decide) that a legally constituted committee could exercise such a choice, but there has been no inquest and there is no committee. The guardian ad litem has, of course, only the power to defend, which he has done. And neither by statute nor from the common law does any court of this state have authority to fill the void.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Margaret Vaughn v. Sutton Ruoff
253 F.3d 1124 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Vaughn v. Ruoff
253 F.3d 1124 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service v. Kirkendall
841 F. Supp. 796 (E.D. Michigan, 1993)
Matter of Guardianship of Matejski
419 N.W.2d 576 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1988)
Ps by Harbin v. Ws
443 N.E.2d 67 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1982)
P.S. ex rel. Harbin v. W.S.
443 N.E.2d 67 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1982)
Matter of Terwilliger
450 A.2d 1376 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Wentzel v. Montgomery General Hospital, Inc.
447 A.2d 1244 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
In the Matter of Moe
432 N.E.2d 712 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1982)
K. C. M. v. State
627 P.2d 607 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1981)
Matter of CDM
627 P.2d 607 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re Grady
426 A.2d 467 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
In the Matter of Guardianship of Eberhardy
294 N.W.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1980)
In Re the Guardianship of Hayes
608 P.2d 635 (Washington Supreme Court, 1980)
Hudson v. Hudson
373 So. 2d 310 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)
In Re Grady
405 A.2d 851 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Guardianship of Tulley
83 Cal. App. 3d 698 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
In re S. C. E.
378 A.2d 144 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1977)
Matter of SCE
378 A.2d 144 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1977)
Government of the Virgin Islands ex rel. Miller
13 V.I. 489 (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 S.W.2d 579, 1968 Ky. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-powers-kyctapphigh-1968.