Holmes v. Neal

Seventh Circuit

Holmes v. Neal

825 F.3d 347, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10859

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 2016

DocketNos. 14-3359, 04-3549

StatusPublished

This text of 825 F.3d 347 (Holmes v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. Neal, 825 F.3d 347, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10859 (7th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On April 5, 2016, petitioner-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en bane, and on May 19, 2016, respondent-appellee filed an answer to the petition. All the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition, and none of the judges in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. The petition is therefore DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On April 5, 2016, petitioner-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en bane, and on May 19, 2016, respondent-appellee filed an answer to the petition. All the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition, and none of the judges in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. The petition is therefore DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

825 F.3d 347, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-neal-ca7-2016.