Holmes v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Holmes v. Morgan

52 Ark. 99

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 99 (Holmes v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. Morgan, 52 Ark. 99 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Liquors: Order prohibiting sale of: Appeal. The judgment of the County Court was not an allowance against Desha County within the meaning of Section 51, Article 7, of the Constitution.

We are not called to decide whether B. F. Morgan might or might not have become a party to the proceeding in the County Court. It is sufficient to say that he made no effort to avail himself of the right, if it existed.

Not being a party to the proceeding, he could not appeal. Austin v. Crawford Co., 30 Ark., 578.

Reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Liquors: Order prohibiting sale of: Appeal. The judgment of the County Court was not an allowance against Desha County within the meaning of Section 51, Article 7, of the Constitution.

We are not called to decide whether B. F. Morgan might or might not have become a party to the proceeding in the County Court. It is sufficient to say that he made no effort to avail himself of the right, if it existed.

Not being a party to the proceeding, he could not appeal. Austin v. Crawford Co., 30 Ark., 578.

Reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ark. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-morgan-ark-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack