Holmes v. Miller
This text of Holmes v. Miller (Holmes v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILBERT ROY HOLMES, No. 84005 Appellant, vs. ERNEST MILLER; AND CAPUCINE FILED YOLANDA HOLMES, JAN 0 6 2on Res ondents. EUZABFRI A. BROWN OLERKIVUPREME COLIgr BY •
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPXCIER s
This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant fails to identify any appealable order. To the extent appellant wishes to challenge findings from a prove up hearing possibly held December 21, 2021, no written order has been filed. Before a written order is signed and entered by the court, any notice of appeal is prematurely filed and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Hardesty
/4/14C‘a-Q , J. Stiglich Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NETPDA
o..» 1447A a:iiig4eD cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Wilbert Roy Holmes Ernest Miller Heaton Fontano, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0 ) 1947A 9
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holmes v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-miller-nev-2022.