Holmes v. Leathe

51 S.W. 1132, 149 Mo. 369, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 30
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 9, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 S.W. 1132 (Holmes v. Leathe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Leathe, 51 S.W. 1132, 149 Mo. 369, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 30 (Mo. 1899).

Opinion

GANTT, P. J.

:This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an award. Tbe parties hereto entered into an [370]*370agreement to arbitrate their differences as to the amount due plaintiff as an attorney and counselor at law for certain legal services rendered defendant. Messrs. Given Campbell, Samuel N. Holliday and John J. O’Brien were selected as arbitrators. They duly qualified, heard the evidence and rendered their award.

In due time notice was given of the motion to make the award a judgment of the court. Thereupon defendant moved to vacate the award.

The award was rendered by consent of the parties upon the same testimony heard in Koerner v. Leathe, the appeal in which latter case was heard at the same time with this appeal.

The questions are identical. Eor the reasons given in Koerner v. Leathe, reported at page 361 of this volume, the judgment in this cause is also affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Celaya v. City of Brownsville
203 S.W. 153 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 S.W. 1132, 149 Mo. 369, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-leathe-mo-1899.