Holmes v. Kenyon
This text of 234 S.E.2d 502 (Holmes v. Kenyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This appeal is from judgments that denied appellant’s pro se application to the trial judge and clerk of court for a copy of his criminal trial transcript and [584]*584related documents.
Appellant was convicted in January of 1975 for having committed armed robbery and sentence was imposed. The sentence was amended on March 17, 1975. No direct appeal was taken.
While an indigent is entitled to a copy of his trial transcript for a direct appeal of his conviction, such is not the case in collateral post-conviction proceedings. In Yates v. Brown, 235 Ga. 391 (2) (219 SE2d 729) (1975), this court said: "At the habeas corpus hearing the appellant claimed that he has a right to the transcript of his trial. As is the case with regard to appointed counsel (see footnote I, above), this right is tied to his right of appeal. Once the appeal has been dismissed, he no longer has a right to a trial transcript at state expense. Phillips v. State, 234 Ga. 147 (214 SE2d 884) (1975).”
The judgment below must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 S.E.2d 502, 238 Ga. 583, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-kenyon-ga-1977.