Holmes v. Kennedy
1 Root 77
Opinion
To which it was replied — That the plaintiff was rightfully and lawfully in the possession; that the defendant received from the plaintiff the possession; also a lease of the farm under which he held and enjoyed; he is therefore estopped to object against the plaintiff’s right to recover against him.— And verdict and judgment was for the plaintiff to recover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. Kennedy, 1 Root 77 (Colo. Ct. App. 1775).
1 Root 77 (Holmes v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.