Holmes v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1129 (Holmes v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action is for a statutory penalty for the refusal to.give a transfer over a street railway alleged to have been operated by defendant over East 135th street, and also, as a second cause of action, for a refusal to issue a transfer on July 22, 1903, on the 125th Street Crosstown Line. The defendant denied its control and operation of the 135th Street Line, but made no such denial as to the 125th Street Crosstown Line, as to which alone did the plaintiff make any proof. The judgment was but for a single penalty, and it must be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1905.