Holmes v. Holmes
This text of Holmes v. Holmes (Holmes v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILBERT ROY HOLMES, No. 84136 Appellant, vs. CAPUCINE YOLANDA HOLMES, FILED Respondent. FEB 0 3 2022 ELWASETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY • DEPU7Y CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court minute order vacating a hearing on a motion for stay pending appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County: Heidi Almase, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. No statute or court rule permits an appeal from a minute order vacating a hearing on a motion for stay pending appeal. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
0-;4(iD Silver
J. J. Cadish cc: Hon. Heidi Almase, District Judge, Family Court Division Wilbert Roy Holmes Heaton Fontano, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A cegl&J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holmes v. Holmes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-holmes-nev-2022.