Holmes v. Fienleib

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holmes v. Fienleib

240 A.D. 910

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for change of venue reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The showing made by the plaintiff with respect to the convenience of witnesses whose convenience may be considered preponderates over that made by the defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for change of venue reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The showing made by the plaintiff with respect to the convenience of witnesses whose convenience may be considered preponderates over that made by the defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Holmes v. Fienleib, 240 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 910 (Holmes v. Fienleib) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.