Holmes v. Feist

33 Misc. 808, 68 N.Y.S. 622
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 808 (Holmes v. Feist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Feist, 33 Misc. 808, 68 N.Y.S. 622 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, a tenant, sued her landlord, the defendant, for damages occasioned to her household furniture, etc., by rain coming in her top flat while a new roof was being put on. The questions raised by the appellant on this appeal have been disposed of by the Appellate Term in an action brought against him by another of his tenants, to-wit: Randolph v. Feist, 23 Misc. Rep. 650.

The plaintiff sued for $450, and recovered $150; we think the evidence justified a recovery to that extent.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: McCarthy and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randolph v. Feist
23 Misc. 650 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 808, 68 N.Y.S. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-feist-nynyccityct-1901.