Holmes v. Crane

Supreme Court of Georgia

Holmes v. Crane

3 S.E.2d 636, 188 Ga. 212, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 500

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1939·No. No. 12758·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Justice.

No error is assigned upon any ruling of tlie court made during the trial; but the motion for new trial contains only the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Justice.

No error is assigned upon any ruling of tlie court made during the trial; but the motion for new trial contains only the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Holmes v. Crane, 3 S.E.2d 636, 188 Ga. 212, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 500 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

3 S.E.2d 636 (Holmes v. Crane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.