Holmes v. Crane

Supreme Court of Georgia

Holmes v. Crane

3 S.E.2d 636, 188 Ga. 212, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 500

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 14, 1939

DocketNo. 12758

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.E.2d 636 (Holmes v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. Crane, 3 S.E.2d 636, 188 Ga. 212, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 500 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Justice.

No error is assigned upon any ruling of tlie court made during the trial; but the motion for new trial contains only the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Justice.

No error is assigned upon any ruling of tlie court made during the trial; but the motion for new trial contains only the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.E.2d 636, 188 Ga. 212, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-crane-ga-1939.