Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.

622 A.2d 744, 330 Md. 114, 1993 Md. LEXIS 49
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 7, 1993
DocketNo. 15
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 622 A.2d 744 (Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc., 622 A.2d 744, 330 Md. 114, 1993 Md. LEXIS 49 (Md. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari with review limited to consideration of question four in the petition, it is this 7th day of April, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for consideration of the merits of the appeal. See Horsey v. Horsey, 329 Md. 392, 620 A.2d 305 (1993). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.
649 A.2d 365 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1994)
Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.
633 A.2d 932 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 A.2d 744, 330 Md. 114, 1993 Md. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-coverall-north-america-inc-md-1993.