Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Holmes v. City of Palm Bay

Holmes v. City of Palm Bay

249 So. 3d 760
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 2018·No. Case No. 5D16–2993·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Holmes appeals a non-final order denying her motion to certify the class. We affirm the trial court's order determining that Holmes failed to establish the typicality and predominance elements required under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.220(a) and 1.220(b)(3), respectively. See Easter v. City of Orlando , 249 So.3d 723, 2018 WL 2746467 (Fla. 5th DCA June 8, 2018). We further conclude that there was no error in the trial court's determination that Holmes failed to establish that she would be an adequate class representative.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. City of Palm Bay, 249 So. 3d 760 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

249 So. 3d 760 (Holmes v. City of Palm Bay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Easter v. City of Orlando
249 So. 3d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)