Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Holmes v. City of New London

Holmes v. City of New London

101 A.2d 302, 140 Conn. 477, 1953 Conn. LEXIS 266
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 8, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 A.2d 302 (Holmes v. City of New London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. City of New London, 101 A.2d 302, 140 Conn. 477, 1953 Conn. LEXIS 266 (Colo. 1953).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

All of the claims raised on this appeal have basis only if the finding can be corrected. The [478]*478conclusions of the trial court are legally drawn from the facts as it found them. To interfere with the conclusions would be to substitute different findings of fact. This cannot he done where there is evidence upon which reasoning minds might disagree. Here there is no basis for correcting the finding. This being so, the conclusions must stand.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cassella v. Allen
185 A.2d 293 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1962)
Cassella v. Allen
1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 345 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1962)
Katz v. Martin
120 A.2d 826 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.2d 302, 140 Conn. 477, 1953 Conn. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-city-of-new-london-conn-1953.