Holmes v. City of New London
101 A.2d 302, 140 Conn. 477, 1953 Conn. LEXIS 266
Opinion
All of the claims raised on this appeal have basis only if the finding can be corrected. The [478]*478conclusions of the trial court are legally drawn from the facts as it found them. To interfere with the conclusions would be to substitute different findings of fact. This cannot he done where there is evidence upon which reasoning minds might disagree. Here there is no basis for correcting the finding. This being so, the conclusions must stand.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. City of New London, 101 A.2d 302, 140 Conn. 477, 1953 Conn. LEXIS 266 (Colo. 1953).
101 A.2d 302 (Holmes v. City of New London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cassella v. Allen
185 A.2d 293 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1962)
Cassella v. Allen
1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 345 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1962)
Katz v. Martin
120 A.2d 826 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1956)