Holmes v. City of Fayetteville
281 U.S. 700, 50 S. Ct. 353
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnville, 280 U. S. 531; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. City of Fayetteville, 281 U.S. 700, 50 S. Ct. 353 (1930).
281 U.S. 700 (Holmes v. City of Fayetteville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of Morganton
155 S.E.2d 136 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)