HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

Supreme Court

HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

372 U.S. 710, 83 S. Ct. 1020, 10 L. Ed. 2d 126, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1815

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 15, 1963·No. 70 M·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al., 372 U.S. 710, 83 S. Ct. 1020, 10 L. Ed. 2d 126, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1815 (1963).

Pincite

372 U.S. 710 (HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related