Holmes v. Bronaugh
This text of 266 U.S. 592 (Holmes v. Bronaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 245 U. S. 162; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 U.S. 592, 45 S. Ct. 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-bronaugh-scotus-1925.