Holmes v. Bronaugh
266 U.S. 592, 45 S. Ct. 196
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 245 U. S. 162; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. Bronaugh, 266 U.S. 592, 45 S. Ct. 196 (1925).
266 U.S. 592 (Holmes v. Bronaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ireland v. Woods
246 U.S. 323 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Stadelman v. Miner
246 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Basham
249 U.S. 164 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. Opperman
249 U.S. 448 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert
245 U.S. 162 (Supreme Court, 1917)