Holmes v. Bi-State Development Agency
This text of 218 S.W.3d 477 (Holmes v. Bi-State Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Tim Holmes (Holmes) appeals from a trial court judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Bi-State Development Agency, d/b/a Metro, (Bi-State) on Holmes’ petition for damages for negligence. Holmes was injured by a car after he fell in the roadway subsequent to exiting a Bi-State bus at a designated bus stop. Holmes alleges trial court error in ruling that Bi-State did not have a duty to make the bus stop safe and in excluding certain testimony based on that ruling.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 S.W.3d 477, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2007 WL 92610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-bi-state-development-agency-moctapp-2007.