Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration

737 So. 2d 608, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9531, 1999 WL 503467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1718
StatusPublished

This text of 737 So. 2d 608 (Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration, 737 So. 2d 608, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9531, 1999 WL 503467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue before us is whether an applicant for a Certificate of Need can voluntarily withdraw the application after an administrative law judge preliminarily denied the application but before the agency entered its final order. We agree with the reasoning of our sister court in Middlebrooks v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 529 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), wherein the court held that

Middlebrooks allowed the hearing to proceed to conclusion. The fact-finder not only “retired”, but he rendered a proposed “verdict.” Middlebrooks knew when he sought to withdraw what the outcome of the case was most likely going to be. To allow him to dismiss at that point would afford him the advantage of 2%o hindsight. No other party dismissing pursuant to Rule 1.420(a)(1) is allowed such an advantage.

See also Wiregrass Ranch, Inc. v. Saddlebrook Resorts, Inc., 645 So.2d 374, 376 (Fla.1994)(adopting the Middlebrooks analysis).

Moreover, a voluntary dismissal is an especially dubious remedy where, as here, the agency has adopted no administrative rule that authorizes this remedy or that incorporates the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure into its proceedings. Department of Professional Regulation v. Marrero, 536 So.2d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), rev. denied, 545 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 1989). Accordingly, we REVERSE the Agency’s order dismissing the petition as moot and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Middlebrooks v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MGT. DIST.
529 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Wiregrass Ranch v. Saddlebrook Resorts
645 So. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG. STATE, BD. OF MED. v. Marrero
536 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 So. 2d 608, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9531, 1999 WL 503467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-regional-medical-center-inc-v-state-agency-for-health-care-fladistctapp-1999.