Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation System, Inc.

13 F. App'x 961
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 5, 2001·No. No. 00-1286·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the issues presented in this case,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The March 27, 2000 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is vacated.

(2) The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for further proceedings in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1255, 149 L.Ed.2d 164 (2001). The district court is directed to consider whether the “change in the law” exception to collateral estoppel applies in view of the [962] Traffix decision, and, if appropriate; then to consider the case on the merits.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation System, Inc., 13 F. App'x 961 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

13 F. App'x 961 (Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
532 U.S. 23 (Supreme Court, 2001)