Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation System, Inc.
This text of 13 F. App'x 961 (Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of the issues presented in this case,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The March 27, 2000 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is vacated.
(2) The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for further proceedings in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1255, 149 L.Ed.2d 164 (2001). The district court is directed to consider whether the “change in the law” exception to collateral estoppel applies in view of the [962]*962Traffix decision, and, if appropriate; then to consider the case on the merits.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. App'x 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-group-inc-v-vornado-air-circulation-system-inc-cafc-2001.